This role is still being defined, so your resume has to define it: show a repeatable method, not a collection of clever prompts.
Three things, in order of weight.
Whether you built an evaluation loop, or just eyeballed the outputs
Measurable quality lift: accuracy, pass rate, human-review workload
Whether the prompts survived model upgrades and real traffic
Work them into your title, project descriptions and skills — don't pile them into a list.
Each cover is the template itself, rendered.
Black and white, no decoration — matches the engineering read.
Dark and technical without looking like a design portfolio.
Fits a long list of experiments on one page.
One page. Unless you have 10+ years and a genuinely full second page, the second page only dilutes the first. Put whether you built an evaluation loop, or just eyeballed the outputs above the fold.
Pasting prompt text into the resume instead of describing the outcome. It is the single most common reason this role gets screened out, and fixing it matters far more than changing templates.
Use AI for the first draft, then verify every claim and number yourself and reorder keywords against the target job description. AI handles speed; the content is still your responsibility.