The differentiator is not that you use AI tools — everyone does now. It's whether AI changed your output volume or cost in a way you can prove.
Three things, in order of weight.
Throughput before and after: pieces per week, cost per piece
Quality control — how you kept AI content from reading like AI content
Channel results: play counts, conversion, follower growth
Work them into your title, project descriptions and skills — don't pile them into a list.
Each cover is the template itself, rendered.
Creative gradient reads right for content roles.
Bold color without being unprofessional.
Good if you're a recent grad going into content.
One page. Unless you have 10+ years and a genuinely full second page, the second page only dilutes the first. Put throughput before and after: pieces per week, cost per piece above the fold.
Listing the tools you use as the whole skills section. It is the single most common reason this role gets screened out, and fixing it matters far more than changing templates.
Use AI for the first draft, then verify every claim and number yourself and reorder keywords against the target job description. AI handles speed; the content is still your responsibility.